In the world of professional wrestling, the debate over who is more valuable - a wrestler who can make themselves look good or one who can elevate others - rages on. This discussion takes center stage in the latest episode of Marking Out with MVP & Dwayne Swayze, where AEW star MVP takes a swing at WWE Chief Content Officer Paul "Triple H" Levesque, or as he calls him, "Triple Nose."
MVP's critique of Triple H is multifaceted. He begins by highlighting the success of The Undertaker, a top guy who has helped numerous stars get over, including the not-so-great Khali. In contrast, MVP questions Triple H's ability to elevate others, citing a lack of memorable moments where he made other wrestlers look good. When the topic of Jeff Hardy is brought up, MVP takes a dig at Triple H's infamous three-count finish, where he sat up smiling instead of selling a legitimate injury.
The discussion then shifts to the idea of a wrestler's overall value to the company. MVP argues that while Triple H was a top guy who drew a lot of money, his inability to elevate others makes him overrated. He compares Triple H's contributions to those of The Undertaker, who, despite having a similar draw, has a longer list of successful collaborations. MVP's point is that a wrestler who can make themselves look good and also help others rise is more valuable in the long run.
The article also delves into the political dynamics backstage, where MVP imagines Triple H playing a game of "Well, you know, Vince, I was thinking maybe he's not ready yet" when asked to put someone over. This adds a layer of humor to the critique, suggesting that Triple H's influence might be more about power dynamics than genuine talent.
While MVP may be exaggerating Triple H's shortcomings, the article raises an interesting point about the balance between self-promotion and helping others. It prompts readers to question the criteria for success in professional wrestling and the impact of behind-the-scenes politics on a wrestler's career.
In conclusion, MVP's commentary serves as a thought-provoking piece that challenges the traditional view of star power in wrestling. It invites readers to consider the nuances of success and the complex interplay between talent, management, and the art of making others look good.
